0
comments
19 May 2010
The SCOTUS case that has come close to driving me mad.
Court Docs: | |
| City of Ontario, CA v Jeff Quon | SCOTUS Oral Arguments |
| Quon v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING CO., INC. | 9th Circuit Opinion |
Readings: | |
| The Information Management Journal September/October 2008 | Bosses Can’t Read Employees’ Messages,Court Says |
| Michigan Law Review | The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and The Case For Caution |
| Yale Law School | |
| ASAP: Littler Mendelson | |
| Berkeley Technology Law Journal | Quon v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING CO. 554 F.3d 769 (9th Cir. 2009) |
Over the last month or so, I’ve lost my dreamy-eyed wonder over this case. That is until I had to hash out the particulars of certain relationships between the people involved (Quon et al). I’m not in love with writing about how “this guy is that guy’s mistresses’ husband,” and “torrid love affairs conducted with grammatically challenged, English language deprived text messages,” but it does serve to spice it up a bit.
Hopefully, I can get this 40 page beast of a project done by my summer deadline. If not, at least I have 40 pages on a useless-to-anyone-but-me subject. Hooray.
Posts
